Oops -- NO, the blue arrow is NOT where the near-lane-parallel traffic would be waiting!
It is in the lane furthest from the pedestrian -- look at the illustration to the right, and you can see that after they surge forward, the vehicles pass the pedestrian in the far lane.
Return to quiz

Congratulations, you are CORRECT! The blue arrow is NOT where the near-lane-parallel traffic would be waiting.
Return to quiz
Ooooh, no -- you fell for the oldest trick in the book! the blue arrow is NOT where the near-lane-parallel traffic would be waiting - it is in the FAR lane, and if you look to the right you'll see that those vehicles stay in the far lane.
But hey, don't feel badly, this is the most common mistake that people make, and hopefully you learned a lesson.
If you still don't understand what's wrong, you can click here to see the explanation -- when you're done, simply scroll down to get back to the quiz.
Return to quiz
Congratulations, you are CORRECT! The blue arrow is in the far lane -- you can see to the right that those vehicles stay in the far lane (the full explanation is here).
Hey, it's time to go and CELEBRATE -- this scenario was the trickiest one that most people get wrong, and YOU DIDN'T FALL FOR IT, congratulations!
Return to quiz
Congratulations, you are correct! The blue arrow is where the near-lane-parallel traffic would be for this pedestrian.
Return to quiz
Oops -- the answer should be YES, the blue arrow is where the near-lane-parallel traffic would be waiting.
Take a look at the example where the parallel street is on your left -- the near-lane-parallel traffic (that is, the traffic in the lane nearest to your crosswalk) is close beside you.
Return to quiz
Congratulations, you are correct! The blue arrow is where the near-lane-parallel traffic would be for this pedestrian.
Return to quiz
Oops -- the answer should be YES, the blue arrow is where the near-lane-parallel traffic would be waiting.
Take a look at the example where the parallel street is on your right -- the near-lane-parallel traffic (that is, the traffic in the lane nearest to your crosswalk) is ahead of you, on the other side of the parallel street.
Return to quiz
The only potential conflict is with vehicles turning left.
However, vehicles can usually turn left without any conflict when there are only left-turning vehicles coming from the opposite direction.
Return to Signalized traffic patterns for vehicles
Left-turning vehicles wait for a gap in the opposing traffic before turning.
Return to Signalized traffic patterns for vehicles
Figure 2. Scatterplot of the percentage yielding by speed for the cane-using and noncane-using conditions.
Description: The figure is a scatterplot. The x-axis is labeled Vehicle approach speed (mph) and has 4 values, from left to right: 20, 30, 40, and 50. The y-axis is labeled Percentage of vehicles yielding and has 11 values, from bottom to top: 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100. Black dots plotted in the graph represent Noncane; White diamonds represent Cane. A horizontal line drawn in the upper half of the graph reads: Cane R(squared) = 0.333. A horizontal line drawn in the center of the graph reads: Noncane R(squared) = 0.038. All values in this narrative are approximations.
20-30 mph: Noncane: 11 ranging from 0-100; Cane: 8 ranging from 80-100.
30-40 mph: Noncane: 11 ranging from 30-70; Cane: 10 ranging from 50-100.
40-50 mph: Noncane: 8 ranging from 0-100; Cane: 2 ranging from 50-80.
Return to Self-Study Guide
References
- Bourquin, E., Wall Emerson, R., Sauerburger, D., & Barlow, J. (2018). Conditions that Influence Drivers' Behaviors at Roundabouts: Increasing Yielding for Pedestrians Who Are Visually Impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness. January-February, Vol. 112, No. 1, pp. 61-71
- Bourquin, E., Wall Emerson, R., Sauerburger, D., & Barlow, J. (2017). The Effect of the Color of a Long Cane Used by Individuals Who Are Visually Impaired on the Yielding Behavior of Drivers. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness. Volume 111, Number 5, pp. 401-410
- Bourquin, E., Wall Emerson, R., Sauerburger, D., & Barlow, J. (2016). Conditions that influence drivers’ yielding behavior: Effects of pedestrian gaze and head movements. International Journal or Orientation and Mobility, 8(1), 13-26.
- Bourquin, E., Wall Emerson, R., Barlow, J. and Sauerburger, D. (2014). Conditions that Influence Drivers' Yielding Behavior in Turning Vehicles at Intersections with Traffic Signal Control. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, AFB Press, Volume 108, Number 3, pp. 173-186
- Bourquin, E., Wall Emerson, R. & Sauerburger, D. (2011). Conditions that influence drivers' yielding behavior while crossing at uncontrolled intersections. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, AFB Press, Volume 105, Number 11, pp. 760-769
- Federal Highway Administration, 2012. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices FHWY, Washington, DC
Return to Self-Study Guide
- New York City Department of Transportation and NY City Vision Zero, August 2016. Don't Cut Corners: LEFT TURN Pedestrian and Bicyclist Crash Study
Return to Self-Study Guide
Barlow, J.M., Bentzen, B.L. and Bond, T. (2005) Blind pedestrians and the changing technology and geometry of signalized intersections: Safety, orientation and independence. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness. Vol 99, (10),587-598.
Return to Self-Study Guide
Barlow, J.M., Bentzen, B.L. and Bond, T. (2005) Blind pedestrians and the changing technology and geometry of signalized intersections: Safety, orientation and independence. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness. Vol 99, (10),587-598.
Return to Self-Study Guide